This SCIENTIST is the Best QUESTIONER I've Ever Seen!👏🏻 Sadhguru with David Eagleman

BEwithSADHGURU
46 000 wyświetleń 1,8M

Neuroscientist Dr. David Eagleman and Sadhguru address a question by a member of the audience, each from their unique perspectives.
Thinking outside the box is common to both of them. When renowned neuroscientist Dr. David Eagleman and Sadhguru met in Houston, Texas on April 2015, an inspiring conversation about the intersection between science and mysticism ensued. In this article, they address a question by a member of the audience, each from their unique perspectives.
Sadhguru: When you say, “I am not the body; I am not the mind” during Isha Kriya, it is not a philosophy or an ideology. It is not a slogan that you keep shouting within yourself and one day become converted. This is a subtle reminder that you add to your breath. Do not use “I am not the body; I am not the mind” to try and psych yourself. You are just adding a certain element to your breath. Otherwise, you are not able to notice your breath. Right now, you are only able to watch the sensations caused by the movement of the air, not the breath itself.
When you are inhaling, not necessarily is only inhalation happening - exhalation could be partly happening as well. Similarly, when you are exhaling, not necessarily is only exhalation happening - inhalation could be partly happening too. But you will not figure this until you notice the way of the breath. Though in many ways, physiologically, the breath is the basis of your life, most human beings have never really experienced their breath. Those who become conscious of just the sensations of the air passage claim all kinds of transformations, and that is true. Your sensations are the outermost layer of who you are. Knowing the sensations is most fundamental. Whatever you touch, whether you sit or stand, there are sensations. The breath is a more profound and subtle dimension which will not come into your experience easily.
If You think Our Work Deserves a Contribution, Feel Free to Contribute on Patreon!
Patreon: www.patreon.com/BEwithSADHGURU
Join Our WhatsApp Community:
chat.whatsapp.com/Iy1uQEvjYbf...
♥Follow BEwithSADHGURU:
Facebook: withsadhguru...
Group: groups/14067...
Instagram: bewithsadhg...
Twitter: SadhguruB
©FAIR-USE COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER©
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, Commenting, News reporting, Teaching, Scholarship, and Research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational, or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
• This video has no negative impact (It would be actually positive for them).
• As a Part of Isha Digital Veera team, we have Permissions and Guidance from the ashram team to use Sadhguru Videos.
• This video is also for teaching purposes. Our team will edit the Video in such a Way it is Understandable for any common audience who is Hearing sadhguru for the first time.
Thank You So Much for Watching!
If you would like to write your ideas to me you can mail me at
mahesh@bewithsadhguru.com
Pranam!

Komentarze: 4 128

  1. Yelukuru Hemanth kumar
    Yelukuru Hemanth kumar
    7 miesięcy temu

    Best thing I noticed was the scientist is listening carefully and speaking sensibly ...not like fools who just want to argue and always want to prove others as wrong

    1. Johan Abdullah
      Johan Abdullah
      5 dni temu

      It's not proving wrong on anyone. As we all know that material, sprit n senses do happen by on its own. God mada in it. There is always a creator, that shape it into live. It cannot evolve, without the intervention of God. The guru cannot answer this aspect, but just want us to swallow all his says.

    2. Gamer
      Gamer
      12 dni temu

      I've listened all this nonsense calmly not this but about gods and all the stuff from my childhood. Also believed god and miracles happened with me. Then I started thinking by myself not what other says. Can you explain what u have got from all this what is your explanation not others

    3. Geburtswehe
      Geburtswehe
      18 dni temu

      Was kann der Einzelne dagegen tun? Jederzeit, wo man geht und steht, das, was man nach eingehender Prüfung für die Wahrheit erfunden hat, öffentlich zu verkünden unter Inkaufname persönlicher Nachteile. Darauf vertrauen, dass die Wahrheit sich am Ende von selbst durchsetzen wird. Dies kann der einzelne Mensch tun und dies ist auch die Aufgabe von uns Menschen: Für die Wahrheit einzutreten, ob gelegen oder ungelegen und darauf vertrauen, dass Gott mit seiner Gewalt den Sieg herbei führen wird. Unsere Aufgabe als Menschen ist es nicht, Gewalt anzuwenden und Hinterlist und Tücke, Empörung und Übertreibung, um unsere Ziele durchzusetzen, sondern lediglich die WAHRHEIT zu verkünden. Den Rest wird Gott erledigen. [vgl 2. Buch der Chronik, Kapitel 20, Verse 16 + 17]

  2. Alexander Cedric Pretorius
    Alexander Cedric Pretorius
    3 miesięcy temu

    The scientists is a role model to other scientists. He is a legend. He was approaching the conversation with an open mind. And doesnt try to argue his point of view. He has a proper conversation. This video should be used as an example of healthy debate in philosophy classes around the world.

    1. Sky is the limit
      Sky is the limit
      Dzień temu

      Right 👍🏻

    2. Alexander Cedric Pretorius
      Alexander Cedric Pretorius
      18 dni temu

      @Kabir Singh if you dont agree to what is said then you don't agree, but to enter into an argument with a snark and arrogant attitude as a strategy just shows lack of character. Once again we return to my original comment, "proper conversation". You indicated in your original comment that you dont agree, now you are asking us what your point of view is. Why dont you tell us your point of view?

    3. Justice League
      Justice League
      18 dni temu

      🙏🌹Read the philosophy of teachings of ISLAM by Hadrat Mirza Ghulam AHMAD as The promised MESSIAH and MAHDI 🤔as Religion evolves so does Man's reasoning and understanding abilities 🤩

    4. RealityInside
      RealityInside
      Miesiąc temu

      not yet become legend

  3. Anthony
    Anthony
    3 miesięcy temu

    *Dr. Eagleman is arguably one of the greatest neuroscientists within the field of neurology and Sadhguru is an amazing philosopher, one of the greatest of his era.* What a match to pair together. Phenomenal interview! 😊🙌🤩📚

    1. Alex Tomlinson
      Alex Tomlinson
      Miesiąc temu

      @spiralmoment sadhguru the only guru with style. Have u seen big man on the bike tho

    2. spiralmoment
      spiralmoment
      Miesiąc temu

      @K it’s the exact same old bullshit as all the other “gurus” he has good taste in cars though.

    3. Anthony
      Anthony
      2 miesięcy temu

      @YASHAS D R I would argue that Eagleman is a philosopher in his own right as well. If you read a lot of his work, it comes across scientific, but it leads to larger questions which are a bit philosophical in their nature

    4. YASHAS D R
      YASHAS D R
      2 miesięcy temu

      O plz dont call him philosopher

  4. Biggurs Bigz .
    Biggurs Bigz .
    Miesiąc temu

    2 intellectual beings discussing 2 points of view... no arguing , no brainwashing, no forcing of each others view upon each other..... lovely discussion

  5. Prawal Raghuvanshi
    Prawal Raghuvanshi
    3 miesięcy temu

    I have altogether got a phenomenal extent of contentment after watching such two of a highly matured and sensible people who are totally ready to accept what's logically correct ..... rather than having a preestablished mindset ...... just amazing !!!

    1. opal yuccas
      opal yuccas
      Miesiąc temu

      I also feel blissed out after hearing this.

    2. Angry Cat
      Angry Cat
      Miesiąc temu

      I picture the dog saying your comment

  6. Paul Victor
    Paul Victor
    5 miesięcy temu

    It's always incredible to watch two individuals with SUCH opposing views and beliefs, having a civil conversation about it. The world needs more of this.

    1. Dino Dini
      Dino Dini
      13 dni temu

      Actually. I saw mostly agreement. The only difference between the two views is one is attached to labels and the other isn't. Without the labels, there is nothing to argue about.

    2. Anubhav Das Sharma
      Anubhav Das Sharma
      Miesiąc temu

      When two extremes like spirituality and science can be discussed peacefully, it makes me cringe seeing something as simple as different portrayals of actors in certain characters being debated on (which one is better and which isn't)

    3. Online Crew
      Online Crew
      Miesiąc temu

      Both are gurus. The one on the left is resistant to science. The right guru is trying to explain his train of thought to someone of minimal expertise.

  7. Joseph Fernando - Piano ♫
    Joseph Fernando - Piano ♫
    5 miesięcy temu

    One of the strongest indicators of intelligence I see is if someone is able to understand when they are wrong, and willing to update and improve their way of thinking...

    1. RazorFlash__
      RazorFlash__
      13 dni temu

      @JP Bro wat....consciousness is not energy, educate yourself, it's a state of being aware making it a resultant of something.

    2. Frey Vestergaard
      Frey Vestergaard
      Miesiąc temu

      @JP I'm curious what you think about split brain patients? These people's brains have been split in two (left and right hemispheres), and to the best of our ability, it looks like there are now two consciousnesses in the same body, each having their own experience, beliefs, desires and abilities. The consciousness that was there before is not the same as after. When the two halves can't communicate with each other, it seems like a unique consciousness exists in each half. I remember a case of a split brain patient who was asked whether he believed in God, and the right half of his brain answered yes, but the left half answered no and that they were an atheist. The consciousness that was there before the brain was split; is it still there? Did it split into two parts because the brain was split into two parts? If so, doesn't it imply that consciousness is reliant upon the brain's condition? If we damage a specific part of the brain, we can lose a specific ability, like the ability to read or understand language, or the ability to recognise faces. We can change our personality from damaging the brain, and we can lose our memory from damaging it. We also understand how many processes in the brain relate to our experience and abilities. You can change some processes in your head from taking a drug, which in turn changes your consciousness. If you make it so that the processes can't communicate with each other (like with split brain patients), then you get two separate consciousnesses, each with different abilities relating to the differences between left and right hemispheres. If my brain could be split up in 10 pieces, would I still be there if there are 10 separate consciousnesses in my body? And now we destroy 5 of the pieces. Am I then still there? It would feel very weird for me to say so. Then we destroy all the pieces, and suddenly my consciousness is back? I'm able to think and feel and even do math? If I lost any memories from damaging my brain, did I then regain those memories from damaging the rest of the brain? Or would you say that my consciousness still exists at that point, but it's not the same as what it's like now?

    3. JP
      JP
      Miesiąc temu

      @Frey Vestergaard - Consciousness is energy, so yes it can exist for all eternity. The brain is simply a physical vessel for that energy to reside in temporarily for one lifetime.

    4. Frey Vestergaard
      Frey Vestergaard
      2 miesięcy temu

      While I totally agree with your claim, I don't think any of them changed their views on anything. The scientist was just trying to understand Sadhguru's perspective, and I think Sadhguru was trying to educate the scientist. I wish they had talked more about consciousness and the brain though. For example what Sadhguru's perspective is on whether he can exist without his consciousness in general, and whether his consciousness can exist without his brain.

    5. shubhashish vasani
      shubhashish vasani
      2 miesięcy temu

      @Syvester toothing Yes dear.

  8. Serdar Benderli
    Serdar Benderli
    3 miesięcy temu

    What's most special about this conversation, is that I don't think I have ever watched singing similar before. I don't think I have ever watched a video of two intelligent people actually having a conversation where they disagree, and yet still converse pleasantly with one another. It's so refreshing, I wish we could see more of this.

  9. Kamin Moyong
    Kamin Moyong
    Miesiąc temu

    All this time had anyone noticed how Sadhguru's English speaking is so refined and upto the point.☺️

    1. Balez Beatz
      Balez Beatz
      13 dni temu

      yes he talk very well

  10. Sadguru says
    Sadguru says
    2 miesięcy temu

    Most profound thing I've heard lately, "believers are in groups, seekers are alone." Explains that feeling of loneliness...love Sadhguru

    1. Jesse James
      Jesse James
      Miesiąc temu

      Thanks for sharing.

  11. Diane Buzz
    Diane Buzz
    2 miesięcy temu

    *Every family has a person who breaks the chain of poverty. I hope you will be that person!!*

    1. Diane Buzz
      Diane Buzz
      13 dni temu

      @spiralmoment good advice, he should read books or watch video and text the system out by himself.

    2. Steve Sam
      Steve Sam
      13 dni temu

      Scammers guys run away. Always makes this kinda comments lol.

    3. Steve Sam
      Steve Sam
      13 dni temu

      Scammers guys run away. Always makes this kinda comments lol.

    4. Steve Sam
      Steve Sam
      13 dni temu

      Scammers guys run away. Always makes this kinda comments lol.

  12. Ranjeet Chaudhury
    Ranjeet Chaudhury
    2 miesięcy temu

    Sadhguru is amazing. He is a great philosopher of this time. He has a least fear to talk so clearly with such a great scientist. Son of great India❤️

    1. Vishal Kumar
      Vishal Kumar
      5 dni temu

      he is not a philosopher

    2. Nikhil Chhonker
      Nikhil Chhonker
      29 dni temu

      mfffdyo

  13. Elin Johnson
    Elin Johnson
    3 miesięcy temu

    I have learned over the years that when one’s mind is made up, this diminishes fear; knowing what must be done does away with fear.

    1. Alex Tomlinson
      Alex Tomlinson
      Miesiąc temu

      @anxy wanxy get it arranged

    2. Alex Tomlinson
      Alex Tomlinson
      Miesiąc temu

      What the fucks going on lol. Bitcoin must be DEAD for fucking recruiter bots to be deployed to chat absolute shit on a PLpost comment section. Someone needs to do a Reddit style deep dive into this comment thread

    3. ElgartV
      ElgartV
      Miesiąc temu

      Agree. If you conquer fear it's limitless.

  14. Stan Leery
    Stan Leery
    3 miesięcy temu

    This is a really good conversation. Both sides really impressed me with their open mindedness and willingness to explain their position without being demeaning or insulting. I sense respect from both sides.

    1. amir jahani
      amir jahani
      2 miesięcy temu

      i think scientist needed more time to gather his knowledge and use them but he had to be quick and he can't express his aspect completely

    2. Shoutg Media
      Shoutg Media
      2 miesięcy temu

      2 matured individuals

    3. lil Chris music
      lil Chris music
      2 miesięcy temu

      The philosopher, doesn't has a tinge for arguement

    4. alex_dezeus
      alex_dezeus
      2 miesięcy temu

      👍🏻

  15. DISCIPLE
    DISCIPLE
    6 miesięcy temu

    The scientist's mind is the most flexible thing i've ever seen. He is ready to accept what is logically correct

    1. Callidus Vulpes
      Callidus Vulpes
      2 miesięcy temu

      @Daniel Pearson He “understands” the idea that the soul isn’t apart of the body he just doesn’t believe it because there is no evidence in favor of it while there is extensive evidence in favor of “you” being just your body.

    2. Lerf8
      Lerf8
      3 miesięcy temu

      Then why did he try to oppose everything that he said?

    3. S R
      S R
      3 miesięcy temu

      The scientist could have been more logical in the counter response to his question against 2:30, Yes We, as species of Human are in fact a piece of geography - Only and only - very precisely well evolved product of our geography. I am sorry to say but Mr. Sadhguru seems like he is making stuff up with a blanket statement without making any sense in the end.

    4. Daniel Pearson
      Daniel Pearson
      3 miesięcy temu

      Then why does he not understand that his soul is him and the soul is not part of the body

  16. Subash Devkota
    Subash Devkota
    3 miesięcy temu

    David is such an amazing scientist with great humor and open mind. On the other hand, Sadguru, the enlightened guy, is spreading drops of bliss with his every word❤️ I am enjoying every bit of this video.

  17. Whale Movement
    Whale Movement
    3 miesięcy temu

    Simply incredible. When he talked about the peel and the fruit that’s inside, that’s when Mr. Eagle knew he was speaking about something so much deeper. Amazing conversation

  18. jopiism
    jopiism
    2 miesięcy temu

    Sadhguru is incredible. His view of alzheimer patients seems far more humane than the other guys!!

  19. Ritesh Vizz
    Ritesh Vizz
    2 dni temu

    when science and spirituality meets. we get a beautiful debate .

  20. Milon Mitra
    Milon Mitra
    6 dni temu

    Excellent talk on Perception, Consciousness, Thought, Emotion, Crisis/conflicts in thought, Social demands etc. We need more of such psychological/philosophical discussions to separate the peel from the fruit or say wood from the trees.

  21. Gertrude Jose
    Gertrude Jose
    2 miesięcy temu

    How an Interview should be and the power of energy pumped into the perfect manner is really beyond !Very much impressed by the both Sadhguru and Dr. David Eagleman! "To Know" is the purpose of our life and all the other is simply a time pass,Dear Mr. Sadguru well said and I am so proud to be a humanbeing !

  22. louise frew
    louise frew
    5 miesięcy temu

    Absolutely brilliant, I really enjoyed this talk with sadhguru and the scientist ❤️❤️❤️

  23. andy rocker
    andy rocker
    3 miesięcy temu

    I think this is beauty of Hinduism. It has way of life practiced by Rishis(also called ancient scientists). Its good to see thousands of foreigners eager to explore the life the way Sadhguru did. Real beauty is, it doesn't asks any individual to change the religion. It is for the people who usually mock the Hinduism and try to humiliate it.

  24. Tesha Yazzie
    Tesha Yazzie
    7 miesięcy temu

    Science and spirituality work together not against one another.

    1. spiralmoment
      spiralmoment
      Miesiąc temu

      Telling yourself fairytales has nothing in common with science.

    2. debuho kontra
      debuho kontra
      Miesiąc temu

      But sometimes science is boastful, that think every study they do they claim as truth, actually not science but people lacking of knowledge that they think they know the very truth, its kinda like a dunning kruger effect

    3. debuho kontra
      debuho kontra
      Miesiąc temu

      Science is conscious mind finding the truth in spiritual mysteries

    4. G.G.
      G.G.
      2 miesięcy temu

      Depends what people mean with spirituality. It's a vague term that can mean anything from consciousness to godhood. Without making it clear I can't accept your assertion.

  25. Billy William
    Billy William
    Godzinę temu

    This man is always inspiring me - very insightful. Great thanks Sadhguru

  26. Seth Renville
    Seth Renville
    3 miesięcy temu

    they skipped through the first 48 minutes and missed the last almost 2 hours! the scientist has great points, and the guru and he agree on MOST! Neither is inherently correct, and, only through connection if both, can we truly understand reality. Quantum physics is the connection. Learn as much as you can about it, and research the "Double Slit Experiment with Meditators" and it proves both are working together. this is not an "us vs. them". Nothing is. It's always an "Us Learning about Us"

  27. Biswarup Ray
    Biswarup Ray
    2 miesięcy temu

    Just read one of his books, he is the best teacher I have ever seen.

  28. D Sonna
    D Sonna
    4 miesięcy temu

    WOW!!.. this conversation is just so awesome.. both parties are at their absolute best!!.. can't say I've ever listenened to something like this one .. so insightful!! damn!!

    1. John T Spout
      John T Spout
      3 miesięcy temu

      Totally agree.... n cool pic

    2. This Body is a Cataract
      This Body is a Cataract
      4 miesięcy temu

      HAKUIN

  29. Venu Doddavarapu
    Venu Doddavarapu
    7 miesięcy temu

    What a great listener and humble and a gentleman David Eagleman is. Great conversation!

    1. Shadowbyurside
      Shadowbyurside
      Miesiąc temu

      On broadcast yes, in personal, Me think No is The best answer.

    2. Ricardo Martinez
      Ricardo Martinez
      4 miesięcy temu

      @Matt Gilbert sorry, see it again cause i don't take the same look at all

    3. Roy Nashick
      Roy Nashick
      4 miesięcy temu

      This so-called 'Sadhguru' is wasting time!Listen to the great teacher Dr.Zakir Naik!Read Holy Quran!!!

  30. Gate Camps R’ Us
    Gate Camps R’ Us
    3 miesięcy temu

    This was so fun to watch. Just a civil, fun conversation of two totally different view points.

  31. Jose Clavero
    Jose Clavero
    3 miesięcy temu

    When the human mind has reached its fullest potential and yet fails to understand...revelation is necessary and this comes not from I but outside.

  32. Prem Dogra
    Prem Dogra
    12 dni temu

    Beautiful conversation, very uplifting and forcing us to understand ourselves truly what and who we are.

  33. Nitin Malhotra
    Nitin Malhotra
    Miesiąc temu

    Best conversation I have ever heard from Sadhguru. Listened to each and every single word very carefully..🙏

  34. Lady Katnip
    Lady Katnip
    5 miesięcy temu

    Sadhguru's message here is wisdom and people can learn a lot in the state of mind he speaks of. I understand Dr. Eagleman's opinion because it is difficult to find the connection between neurology and spirituality. I think it requires combining the subjects of...neurology, physics, and spirituality....and a bit of biology. To escalate our understanding of the world and universe we must start combining the information we have collected instead of getting more nuanced in fields of study. We have gathered all these puzzle pieces and so now we need to put them together, not find more ways to categorize and study them.

  35. Phantomdota
    Phantomdota
    3 miesięcy temu

    What I find humbling is the fact that Sadguru says he’s not a scientist, but I find that the way he approaches the explanation of our human inner mechanics both logical and scientific. I believe he has a brain of a scientist, but has the wisdom to go beyond the limitation of modern science to explore the depths of human spirituality.

  36. Unit With Legs
    Unit With Legs
    5 miesięcy temu

    I first want to say i could watch these two very well spoken and educated men talk for hours (if my body allows lol) I was brought up Christian but eventually around 14 or 15 found too many problems with the church, and logical issues with the biblical scriptures and hypocritical people that i aboned it all in pursuit of science. Most conversations between religious scholars and scientists end in argument or they deny science or evolution. If i had been raised in let's say, Hinduism I think i could have remained spiritual as well as pursue science. In 100 years it wont matter much either way so why not find some spiritual fulfillment? Because it may be wrong? It may be lying to ourselves to know fully explain everything in that method? We lie to ourselves all the time, our view of the world, our very notion of reality is a limited illusion constructed by our brains of the 60% or so of sensory data we take in. Lately i have been engaging in meditation and trying to be more aware and tolerant of the situations and people in my life and i wish i would have been exposed to it sooner.

    1. its_Chyguy
      its_Chyguy
      2 miesięcy temu

      @Diana Anime Shorts in my eyes all polytheistic gods are the same. My religion is what people call mythologies, many of the ancient civilisation have similar gods.

    2. Diana Anime Shorts
      Diana Anime Shorts
      3 miesięcy temu

      @Baloon fridge Yes ive been reading Ramayana as well and it is really beautiful. My friend is a Brahmin(I just learnt what that meant a week ago) and His family had a copy of Ramayana which is english Translated so that i can read it easily. I am treating it just like i treat the bible, with respect. I've reached till the Kishakinadha Chapter and so far its been nothing but mesmerizing. My friend Helps me with the parts that i dont understand coz he has read it 5 times now. You can say i have a good guide with me😁. Nonetheless I've watched Ramayana The Epic, The Legend of Prince Ram and Hanuman movie. all have been so fun to watch.

    3. Baloon fridge
      Baloon fridge
      3 miesięcy temu

      @Diana Anime Shorts most movies and shows are theatrical and tend to miss out on message. Also, they will be in Hindi. And someone would give you subtitles. The subtitles will again miss out on the message. It's best to read the book translated by an expert.

    4. Diana Anime Shorts
      Diana Anime Shorts
      3 miesięcy temu

      @RAM SHARMA yes i have finished 3rd, 7th and 8th Chapters coz my friend told me to read those first. He had read it so it was better for me to have his guidance. It is so thoroughly written. The moment i feel that the question might not be answered by Krishna to Arjun, he asks a counter question which comes to me as well. Such a beautiful book. I read 5 verses or maybe even 15 sometimes. I aim to finish the Gita by the end of Next Month. Coz i am reading the Ramayana as well so it is slow process for me. I am inclined to say that Ramayana is what i like better than The Gita. It's my perspective as the Story of Lord Rama piqued my interest. Tell me if you have any movies or shows for me to see based on Ramayana. Thanks💜

    5. RAM SHARMA
      RAM SHARMA
      3 miesięcy temu

      @Diana Anime Shorts Just read bhagwat gita once you will exposed to many things many positives will come in your life, your perception of who god is will be changed. read once your all thoughts will be clear

  37. Antonio Robinson
    Antonio Robinson
    3 miesięcy temu

    Wow, it's inspiring to hear such a deep profound discussion on the nature of the "self" and our desire to know spoken in such an eloquent, calm and even playful manner. No rudness. No yelling. No talking over eachother 👏👏🗨

    1. John Mayer
      John Mayer
      3 miesięcy temu

      absolutely

  38. James Alexander
    James Alexander
    Miesiąc temu

    Sadhguru was SPITTING! That was amazing. Loved every minute of this piece of the conversation.

  39. kids of India teamwork
    kids of India teamwork
    4 miesięcy temu

    Pleasantful state always.. Is what we need to achieve , excellent explanation Sadguru 🙏

  40. Tøm
    Tøm
    3 miesięcy temu

    This conversation was really nice to listen to ❤👌🙌. In my opinion, the mystical is what we lack. This "lack" of the mystical in our everyday existence is reflected in the way we live on this planet. We have made ourselves comfortable by giving too much importance to the physical quality of life. And on closer inspection, we have simply forgotten an essential part of our existence. The spiritual part of us hasn't changed much since we left caves as "no longer cavemen". We have somehow forgotten our direct physical reference point, this planet. This development requires a bit more mysticism to "understand" the consciousness of being beyond the limits of this planet.

  41. Uday Kiran
    Uday Kiran
    2 miesięcy temu

    This is such a wholesome discussion Neither of them discredit the other Lovely and enlightening in every way possible.

  42. Alan Givré
    Alan Givré
    5 miesięcy temu

    This is one of the best interviews I seen (I myself am a scientist).

    1. R
      R
      2 miesięcy temu

      @IT'S MY 999 WRLD "I parrot memes because original thoughts are confusing"

    2. IT'S MY 999 WRLD
      IT'S MY 999 WRLD
      2 miesięcy temu

      "I'm Something of a Scientist Myself"

    3. Paranthaman V
      Paranthaman V
      2 miesięcy temu

      What kind of scientist are you

    4. Darryl Goolsby
      Darryl Goolsby
      2 miesięcy temu

      I fundamental error we make is the use of the possessive pronouns that we use to describe us within our shared reality. Terms like "my" when we describe our individual attributes like "my mind", "my body", etc. The idea that we own or possess a mind, a body, etc. is flawed. The "we" that we think we are is an apparent amalgamation of many things that work in unison to make a way for the self or perception thereof to emerge.

    5. greylynnjr
      greylynnjr
      3 miesięcy temu

      Me 2

  43. BlackMan
    BlackMan
    24 dni temu

    This is so good i feel blessed just by watching this

  44. Access Obtained
    Access Obtained
    Miesiąc temu

    Can we get Jordan Peterson and Sadhguru om the same stage. It would be phenomenal!

  45. Mohan Singh
    Mohan Singh
    28 dni temu

    For me science and technology are always same but now onwards i love science like i do in my childhood. Sadhguru ❤️

  46. Lifelong learner
    Lifelong learner
    Miesiąc temu

    Difference between comfort and blissful/joyful life is well-explained Sadhguruji. From low energy to high energy requires work, it's method, time - we waste our precious time in learning many skills, games, earning money all life and miss what we are actually meant for here in this world🙏🏻😇

  47. Ean Thomas
    Ean Thomas
    6 miesięcy temu

    I enjoy how they communicate properly in an effort to gain understanding, as opposed to simply debating for a particular perspective to be proven. Very good, very civil.

    1. Rajasekhar Sykam
      Rajasekhar Sykam
      2 miesięcy temu

      Purpose of communication is understanding.

    2. This Body is a Cataract
      This Body is a Cataract
      4 miesięcy temu

      Civil,yes. But the scientist was biting his tongue. "I can call this hand,mine" but NOT ACTUAL CONSCIOUSNESS? I grt where he is coming from,but his reasoning was academic instead of Total. Makes me wonder at his Level (over 9000!)

  48. Ranganath Rao
    Ranganath Rao
    4 miesięcy temu

    One of best conversations of intellects.

  49. david worsnop
    david worsnop
    2 miesięcy temu

    you can tell from body language who is more in control of there self and confident and clarity of knowledge they posess. respect to both men for putting thereselves out there to inspire us to learn ❤

  50. Nitesh Bhushan
    Nitesh Bhushan
    27 dni temu

    Great Questions with Awesome Answers . This is how questions should Be , Hats off dude for your listening patience , and asking totally relevant Question

  51. Jo Hardy
    Jo Hardy
    Miesiąc temu

    Don’t ever argue with a man in socks and sandals ❤️ loved this discussion

  52. Over The Top
    Over The Top
    Miesiąc temu

    What I saw was a student-teacher relationship. I respect the good Dr and the perceptions that he has accumulated to be what he is, but I think he was often dumbfounded by the immense knowledge the Sadhuguru exuded, he couldn't help but listen attentively like a good student.

  53. Jan Willem v.d. Gronden
    Jan Willem v.d. Gronden
    Miesiąc temu

    Love the respectful and quiet exchange of thoughts, a pleasure to watch! 6:33 he nailed it. His counterpart skipped over it by using a fallacy argument of someone who is born blind, rather it it is about the change you register like the blind learning to see, which potentially separates the I from ego (how do you respond to that change, like a victim, like gods miracle etc), physical body (how it responds to change, e.g. a headache because of the increase of input) etc. The I is still registering that change and you can observe yourself, as we find ourselves doing at times almost like an external observer. That is the I he is referring to. People who loose control over their faculties, if not instantaneously, at first register that change, which makes it exactly that terrifying experience we all fear.

  54. Moiz K
    Moiz K
    3 miesięcy temu

    Amazing conversation We are moving away from concioussness to perception.

  55. sree d
    sree d
    5 miesięcy temu

    Can sit listening to my life...I am in exploration through sadguru..thank you

  56. Partha Bagchi
    Partha Bagchi
    7 miesięcy temu

    This is waht a debate should look like. You don't have to agree to everything but you can learn from each other and strive together.

    1. Kaitje
      Kaitje
      27 dni temu

      @This Body is a Cataract well he's a philosopher not narrowed like us by the for example profession we have. Wisdom is something else then intelligence or science.

    2. This Body is a Cataract
      This Body is a Cataract
      4 miesięcy temu

      The guru was 0% interested in learning anything HAKUIN

    3. Aryama Chatterjee
      Aryama Chatterjee
      6 miesięcy temu

      Do you really not understand the difference between a debate and discussion ?

    4. Jinzo
      Jinzo
      6 miesięcy temu

      Although it's amazing and revealing, this is a conversation/discussion, not a debate. A debate sets out clear arguments and opposing views and is meant to be conflicting at times.

  57. josh hill
    josh hill
    3 miesięcy temu

    "It need not be useful, it simply wants to know" is probably the best description of my time spent.

  58. Naman Sharma
    Naman Sharma
    4 miesięcy temu

    Great and healthy conversation between scientist and sadguru. I like scientist's behaviour and his way of asking questions,

  59. Gautam
    Gautam
    Miesiąc temu

    The scientist's listening capabilities are insane for one who doesn't believe in this all stuff... He is trying to know what the person in front of him thinks, even when he thinks what the person thinks is wrong. That's something I desire. I usually loose my calm in such situations because of how senseless I think people in front of me are being.

    1. Shiva
      Shiva
      Miesiąc temu

      So how you react or in that situation when you think the other person is senseless...

  60. Timothy Mohan
    Timothy Mohan
    Miesiąc temu

    Absolutely appreciate this man every video.

  61. Bran@094#
    Bran@094#
    2 miesięcy temu

    Super level discussion.. worth listening 1000times.

  62. Deepa RM
    Deepa RM
    3 miesięcy temu

    An interview which I have watched many times and which I like very much.the scientist is ready to accept things which he doesn't know as he doesn't know and he is new to many insights of life which Sadguru throws light upon

  63. Tyler Sizelove
    Tyler Sizelove
    3 miesięcy temu

    I was reading this in the Philosophers Handbook, how in every human we have a desire to know more and when science cant quite get there we turn to a deeper state of thinking on what constitutes as the self.

    1. G.G.
      G.G.
      Miesiąc temu

      @JB 4 72 I could just call that delusion and that would be just as much of a valid argument.

    2. JB 4 72
      JB 4 72
      Miesiąc temu

      @G.G. For some people it remains an assumption because they haven't reached that level of realization.

    3. G.G.
      G.G.
      Miesiąc temu

      @JB 4 72 That is an assumption not a fact.

    4. JB 4 72
      JB 4 72
      Miesiąc temu

      That desire to know is ultimately the desire to know our Creator - This is the purpose of our existence.

  64. Zutto
    Zutto
    Miesiąc temu

    Randomly stumble upon this video. This was very interesting. It's nice to see such a civil conversation between 2 people with different views. The scientist seemed very open minded, he listened and tried to understand before speaking. I want to see the full interview

  65. apitapi
    apitapi
    Miesiąc temu

    The fact that this "glass wall" was hit by science and yet science still remains to develop is magnificent. I wonder what parts of mysticism and philosophy will be uncovered as scientific truths.

  66. sangeeta shah
    sangeeta shah
    2 miesięcy temu

    Absorbing from the surroundings and understanding of what's already with in , completes the meaning of life . 🙏 What you see is not me What's me is to be searched And once the searching comes to an end you become me and me becomes you at that point of equilibrium the understanding of God completes . ❤️

  67. Harinder Grewal
    Harinder Grewal
    Miesiąc temu

    We began with the fundamental question, are “we”, or the fundamental idea of self, of I, “me”, something that is beyond merely the physical body and the brain (of thought and emotion). It was a very good question that was not answered fully by Sadhguru. Instead, he diverted the conversation and made multiple contradictory statements. On the one hand he claimed that such a “me” could exist even in the face of a brain injury, or disease mocking mental illness as somewhat of personal character weakness or a business these days (a very dangerous statement that is completely unsupported by clinical evidence and lived experiences of many people with mental illnesses and disorders worldwide). Sadhguru appears to claim that some kind of self exists despite changes in a brain. He does not explain how this could be possible or how it would be possible. At the end of the video he concludes that science only sees the physical and in essence misses the “fruit” of existence while only seeing its peel. If that peel is so much clearer to a mystic such as Sadhguru then it’s essence and exact nature should be better explained! What exactly is consciousness if it is beyond a brain and the physical elements within a body. If consciousness does not need a particular body why does it attach itself to one at all? If it continues after death where does it go without the body? Is such consciousness an absence of thought? Of personality? Is it a form of energy? If yes then I would have loved to understand exactly what such claims made to actually mean. There is absolutely little positive outcomes to challenge science and question its limitations! Science is NOT flawed, it is simply the best form of inquiry that we have got as a humanity. It is accountable, it relies on testing and reliable results, collecting data and proving a fact or discovering a truth. As such we can rely on it much more than a simple blind trust on a word of a self proclaimed “mystic” who cannot even acknowledge he has naturally been influenced by culture tradition and religion in growing as a human. We are human, we are limited and yet as an intelligent living being we will continue to question, experience and most of all tell some great stories. I choose the side of the Neuroscientist David Eagleman simply for asking the right questions here. 🙏🏽

    1. Samaksh Namdev
      Samaksh Namdev
      Miesiąc temu

      Loved each and every word written by you and i agree with you. Sadhguru never answers any question in a demonstrable and explained way. Hence, the listener is left confused/speechless because of the irrelevant nature of his explanations. I am sure he would have answered your questions (in this comment) in the same way as he did with this scientist. I also choose the side of the scientist. I think he was asking the right questions and sadhguru failed to answer them but successfully bypassed the questions just like always.

  68. Ajay Varma
    Ajay Varma
    Miesiąc temu

    David Eagleman has amazing perspective. We might be an accumulation but this accumulation of physical, emotions, feelings, mental being and many more is ourselves. You cannot keep peeling an Onion to find an Onion, the layers of Onion are itself Onion and not separate.

  69. Hey onion
    Hey onion
    3 miesięcy temu

    A beautiful thing about Mister Eagleman: he knows he does not know. Or he seems to

    1. Callidus Vulpes
      Callidus Vulpes
      2 miesięcy temu

      @Vikash kumar Sharma Scientists don’t have “answers” that Sadhguru has because they have to actually substantiate their claims before people believe them. Hearsay shouldn’t be believed or tolerated, no matter who it comes from.

    2. Vikash kumar Sharma
      Vikash kumar Sharma
      2 miesięcy temu

      @Lazzy he never said that ....right now sadhguru is the only person who has zero questions that he cant answer even scientists dont have answers that sadhguru has .....thats a punch to the face of self profound intellectual overrated scientists

    3. Lazzy
      Lazzy
      3 miesięcy temu

      @salek hossain And Sadhguru claims he gained all knowledge in one night

    4. salek hossain
      salek hossain
      3 miesięcy temu

      Science teaches to be doubtful. To know that you don't know enough.

    5. derPetunientopf
      derPetunientopf
      3 miesięcy temu

      He is a scientist and every true scientist knows that science aka the search for more or better knowledge by scientific methods never stops. A true scientist will always be open to critic and learning more. I am not so sure that the guru was just as open but they understood and respected each others perspective so they had a good talk.

  70. Amit erp
    Amit erp
    Miesiąc temu

    Thank you ❤️ for uploading such a precious vedio 🙏

  71. Alexander Guryev
    Alexander Guryev
    2 miesięcy temu

    Wow! This man makes two impressive points about the modern society: 1. Nowadays indeed, we have a very bad science, because the academy has become an entire enterprise interested in rankings and forcing scientists to publish at so huge speed that there's no even time for doing a good research. 2. Another point, we are nowadays so attached to external values, but we are not happy. We have a very good quality of life in physical terms, and a poor miserable life in spiritual terms, leading to the unprecedented growth of mental issues across the world. It's a paradox.

  72. Rob Gau
    Rob Gau
    4 miesięcy temu

    There are many examples of people, whether through injury or birth defect, do not have full mental faculties. That is to say some of them are born this way and some become this way due to illness or injury. Yet, they experience what's being called "the Golden Hour." For a short period before their death, they suddenly become fully aware of who they are, who their family is and where they are and have full conversations with surrounding family members. Like magically wake up just to say goodbye. Even people who have never communicated with anyone.

  73. Ébe Isaac
    Ébe Isaac
    5 miesięcy temu

    Mind-blowing conversation!

  74. Mr Madafakka
    Mr Madafakka
    2 miesięcy temu

    I would love to see a conversation between Sadhguru and Jordan Peterson . That would be Epic ♥️🥰

    1. Sans Free Will
      Sans Free Will
      Miesiąc temu

      They might agree on more than you think. Both have spiritual tendencies

    2. K
      K
      Miesiąc temu

      wat would be the point? Jordan Peterson outlook and takes are locked on western psychology..while sadhguru has enlightened unbounded views and takes.

  75. Christopher Sobel
    Christopher Sobel
    2 miesięcy temu

    these will be philosophy conversations that we remember for centuries. I think this will be remembered like Plato and Aristotle are remembered today

  76. pushplata Sharma
    pushplata Sharma
    3 miesięcy temu

    He was soo focused he wanted to clear every doubt and the way he thinks the side of sadhguru he agreed veryy sensiblyyy om namah shivay💙

  77. Sixtynine Elephants
    Sixtynine Elephants
    3 miesięcy temu

    More important than the words being spoken is how they are being listened to, and responded to with respect. And this is why most people seem intent on never learning.

  78. Varun shrivastava
    Varun shrivastava
    5 miesięcy temu

    amazing questioner. David Eagleman is brilliant. Sadhguru didnt answered the core question though.

  79. stonedsynthesizer
    stonedsynthesizer
    3 miesięcy temu

    Good talk, witty comments from both that had me chuckling and laughing at times.

  80. ᴋᴀʀᴍᴀ
    ᴋᴀʀᴍᴀ
    2 miesięcy temu

    Both have a great Patience 👏

  81. S C
    S C
    Miesiąc temu

    Such a wonderful input from both, in essence agreed with each other

  82. Da Sharq
    Da Sharq
    4 miesięcy temu

    These talks are great for bringing the common awareness towards Realization. But intentional actions are required for anyone who wishes to truly comprehend Sadhguru's words. A talk like this exists only to show you there might be something else to know than just science and the physical world; action is required to begin understanding, and it may take a while to really understand. There are a series of profound "aha" moments that happen when you begin to tear down your attachments to the physical, but we in the west have no framework from which to do such a thing. If you are seeking more, I might suggest the "Bhagavad Gita" - it is a direct, concise guide for "what to do if you want to SEE." It requires an effort that most will probably give up on; their hold on the physical world makes it impossible, much like Neo in the scene where Morpheus is telling him to "just jump." He can't do it. He only trusts his senses.

  83. Jay Alshehri
    Jay Alshehri
    2 miesięcy temu

    👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻 what a beautiful explanation 🫶🏻 Sadhguru

  84. Anupam Roy
    Anupam Roy
    5 miesięcy temu

    "that we hit a long time ago" 😂 .... Such a beautiful session.

  85. Pothraj Shyamala
    Pothraj Shyamala
    5 miesięcy temu

    Spiritual enlightenment must and important, there is a need of TEACHER like you to millions

  86. Tobom Pakba
    Tobom Pakba
    3 miesięcy temu

    their English and speaking skills is so clear....really love it❤❤❤

  87. Nova Docs
    Nova Docs
    5 miesięcy temu

    Mind-blowing speech.

  88. Cassie Beevis
    Cassie Beevis
    Miesiąc temu

    "Just to be the way Creation intended you to be." Yes.

  89. Rudra Singh
    Rudra Singh
    3 miesięcy temu

    Well, I do imagine my hero, Carl Sagan to be in that scientists place. No one as mediocre as Sadhguru would be able to challenge his valuable words, without sounding stupid. For Carl 🙌

  90. person
    person
    5 miesięcy temu

    I think that there is a class of scholars who just do research and exploration in order to get prizes and honour, Sadhguru explained the basic essence of all professions and how they should be.

  91. venu gopal
    venu gopal
    4 miesięcy temu

    brilliant scientist, pure logical questioning

  92. Zhiikozhiio Kriibve
    Zhiikozhiio Kriibve
    2 miesięcy temu

    #Respect to David Eagleman, replied everything so precisely 👍 meanwhile am still waiting for that Oldman to reply "what is the You that can be separated from the physical"

  93. WebRaaja - Digital Marketing
    WebRaaja - Digital Marketing
    4 miesięcy temu

    I got a new stuff today. The fruit is inside. Love you sadhguru. 💐

  94. Kavyaanjali Poems
    Kavyaanjali Poems
    5 miesięcy temu

    The scientist is such a good listener and is genuinely trying to understand a point of view which is different from his perception..

  95. Master L
    Master L
    3 miesięcy temu

    In this video it's clear to see that guru's mind is much more flexible than the neuroscientists, although the scientist is logical, he's not able to twist his mind to different dimensions as the mystic is. The mystic no doubt is on par with the logic, but he clearly seems to have an extra dimension that the scientist lacks, for better or for worse

  96. Nancy McShane
    Nancy McShane
    5 miesięcy temu

    Every year seems shorter than the one before. When you are ten years old, a year is on tenth of your existence. When you are fifty years old, one year is a fiftieth of your experience. That is why time seems to speed up the older you get!

  97. PS
    PS
    Miesiąc temu

    Sadhguru always comes with a Refreshingly different perspective.

  98. Mohammed Sheikh
    Mohammed Sheikh
    Miesiąc temu

    Sadhguru knows how to make you go in circles by continuously deviating from the subject, jumping from one point to another completely different point, without making any sense or firm outcome of the topic of discussion. He's great at the art of scholarly sounding confusing gibberish.

    1. Pierre.A.
      Pierre.A.
      Miesiąc temu

      This is 100%, he deviated from all the subject as soon the scientist had solid arguments that caught the charlatan off guard. 100%!!!

  99. anirudh chandra
    anirudh chandra
    4 miesięcy temu

    It was humble & great to listen this conversation. Gratitude for well being is the key takeaway from this. One of the few conversations where 2 great minds are able to go deeply with a rational bent & not being perceptively congenial!

  100. Madhav Sharma
    Madhav Sharma
    3 miesięcy temu

    THIS IS CALLED AN INTELLECTUAL TALK ACTUALLY MAN THIS IS THE BEST OF SADHGURU I HAVE FEASTED MY EARS UPON. WE DONT NEED DEBATES LIKE JOEL BUT LIKE DAVID EAGLEMAN